Legal Opinion

People v. Hoskin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 26, 2016No. Supreme Court Case 15SC136PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright

¶1 In this case, we must determine (1) whether Colorado’s speeding statute creates a permissive inference or a mandatory rebut-table presumption and (2) whether there is sufficient evidence to support Respondent/Cross-Petitioner Gregory K. Hoskin’s speeding violation. The county court found that Mr. Hoskin committed a traffic infraction in violation of the speeding statute, section 42-2-1101, C.R.S. (2016), because the People offered evidence that he was driving in excess of the posted speed limit and he did not “contradict[ ] and overcome” this evidence with proof that his speed was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Krueger v. ArySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. Arthur C. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Glenda R. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Jolly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Borer v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. School District No. 1 in the City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. v. TibbelsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. Alexis Teran Sanchez, Petitioner: v. The People of the State of Colorado. Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026
  5. Fritzler v. Mitchell (In re Estate of Fritzler)Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API