Plummer v. Hubbard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
i The action is for ejectment. The real property in question has been sold on execution issued upon a judgment against the plaintiff. The defendant is in possession of the property by virtue of a sheriff’s deed. The plaintiff claims that the judgment was void.
The admitted facts are these: On August 5, 1907, the plaintiff, then a member of the Seneca Nation of Indians, purchased the premises in question for the sum of sixty dollars, and they were conveyed to him by deed recorded in Cattaraugus county clerk’s office October 3, 1907. He went into possession immediately. The property…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Elk v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Seneca Nation of Indians v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Seneca Nation v. ChristySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mulkins v. . SnowNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Acosta v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tenorio v. TenorioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Andrews v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of WorkhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- In re ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.