Legal Opinion

McCullen v. Coakley

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 29, 2010No. Civil Action 08-10066-JLTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

1. Introduction

This case concerns a recently revised Massachusetts statute, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 266, § 120E1/2 (“Act”), which establishes a thirty-five-foot fixed buffer zone around driveways and entrances of reproductive health care facilities (“RHCFs”). Presently at issue are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Permit Arguments as to Facial Invalidity [# 95], Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on the As-Applied Claims in Counts Two Through Eight [# 99], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [# 94],

Plaintiffs’ Motion to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. McCullen v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Clift v. City of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API