McCullen v. Coakley
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
1. Introduction
This case concerns a recently revised Massachusetts statute, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 266, § 120E1/2 (“Act”), which establishes a thirty-five-foot fixed buffer zone around driveways and entrances of reproductive health care facilities (“RHCFs”). Presently at issue are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Permit Arguments as to Facial Invalidity [# 95], Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on the As-Applied Claims in Counts Two Through Eight [# 99], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [# 94],
Plaintiffs’ Motion to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- McCullen v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Clift v. City of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013