Legal Opinion
McCullen v. Coakley
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 9, 2013No. 12-1334PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This case does not come to us as a stranger. At the turn of the century, the Massachusetts legislature passed a law that created fixed and floating buffer zones around abortion clinics. We rejected serial challenges to the constitutionality of that law. See McGuire v. Reilly (McGuire I), 260 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2001) (rejecting facial challenge); McGuire v. Reilly (McGuire II), 386 F.3d 45 (1st Cir.2004) (rejecting as-applied challenge). The Su preme Court denied certiorari. 544 U.S. 974, 125 S.Ct. 1827, 161 L.Ed.2d 724 (2005).
One might have thought that the matter would end…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- (PS) Hill v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Clift v. City of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Conners v. PohlmannDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- EverySpace Construction, LLC v. Encor Solar, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.