Legal Opinion

United States v. Fort

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 18, 2000No. 2:99-cv-00212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FITZWATER, District Judge.

In this case involving a motion to suppress the fruit of a warrantless commercial vehicle regulatory inspection, the court holds that the stop was justified at its inception, and that running a warrant check on the driver was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the interference, because doing so did not extend what would otherwise have been the duration of the regulatory stop. The court therefore denies defendant’s motion to suppress. 1

I

On September 4, 1999 Texas Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) Trooper Mike…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marvin L. Harrison v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API