Legal Opinion
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 16, 1979No. 79-1641PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
In Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 98 S.Ct. 1816, 56 L.Ed.2d 305 (1978), the Supreme Court declared that the Fourth Amendment stands between an employer and the use of compliance inspections by the agency charged with enforcing the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the Act).1 From the time of that decision, numerous controversies have arisen over the standards for administrative probable cause2 and over the procedures for issuing *1131inspection warrants that must be satisfied before officers of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Lyons, James v. U.S. Marshals Carlson, Norman, Director UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Cerro Metal Products v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ticor Title Insurance Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Susquehanna Valley Alliance v. Three Mile Island Nuclear ReactorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Andrea Patricia Duvall, (Nee Andrea Patricia Phillips) v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.