Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burk v. Beaudoin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1950No. 35,167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

By this proceeding in prohibition, relator seeks to restrain respondent from sitting as the acting judge of the municipal court of South St. Paul after the filing of an affidavit of prejudice upon the trial of relator for a misdemeanor. The questions raised by the proceeding are so simple that they appear from the answers given herein without stating them.

Prohibition is the proper remedy to restrain a judge from acting in a matter where he is disqualified by an affidavit of prejudice. Payne v. Lee, 222 Minn. 269, 24 N. W. (2d) 259; State ex rel. Olson v. Schultz, 200 Minn. 363, 274 N. W. 401.

T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Payne v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. State ex rel. Derusha v. McMartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. State Ex Rel. Olson v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Nichols v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. McClelland v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. La Jesse v. MeisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. State v. KettererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Larsen v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API