Legal Opinion

Benguiat v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1971No. Civ. 36937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRAMPTON, J. *

Both plaintiffs, Albert Benguiat and Marion B. Riffo, are former employees of the City of Los Angeles and are now receiving a retirement allowance by virtue of having, prior to their retirement, been members in the Department of Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan (hereafter the “DWP Plan”).

Albert Benguiat was born on December 7, 1911. He rendered services in various departments of the City of Los Angeles (hereafter “the City”), as an employee thereof as follows: From May 6, 1929 to February 18, 1931, both dates inclusive in the library department; from February…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Baird v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API