Holst v. City of LaGrange
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
Mrs. Charles Holst filed a petition against the City of LaGrange, a municipal corporation, seeking an injunction against the enforcement of a street-paving assessment. The defendant demurred upon the grounds that the petition failed to set forth a cause of action, and that the plaintiff had a complete and adequate remedy at law. The judge sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition, and the plaintiff excepted. The petition alleged the following facts: The plaintiff is the owner of a described lot of land in the City of LaGrange, situated at an intersection of two streets or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Martin v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Speer v. Mayor of AthensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Webb v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- City of Atlanta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Bennett v. VittumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1935