Legal Opinion

Holst v. City of LaGrange

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 1932No. 8761PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Mrs. Charles Holst filed a petition against the City of LaGrange, a municipal corporation, seeking an injunction against the enforcement of a street-paving assessment. The defendant demurred upon the grounds that the petition failed to set forth a cause of action, and that the plaintiff had a complete and adequate remedy at law. The judge sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition, and the plaintiff excepted. The petition alleged the following facts: The plaintiff is the owner of a described lot of land in the City of LaGrange, situated at an intersection of two streets or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Martin v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Speer v. Mayor of AthensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Webb v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. City of Atlanta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Bennett v. VittumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API