Bennett v. Vittum
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
It is declared in section 2 of the act approved March 31, 1926 [Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1926, p. 65], amending the charter of the City of Adel, that whenever any of the streets shall have been authorized under the laws and ordinances to be paved, and the contract for such improvement has been let and the entire cost to the city has been ascertained, the mayor and council “shall by written resolution apportion the cost and expenses of the same pro rata per front foot to the several tracts, lots, or parcels of lands abutting upon the area covered by such proposed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Speer v. Mayor of AthensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Hayden v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- City of Valdosta v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- City of Atlanta v. HamleinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Almand v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Webb v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Kirkpatrick v. VittumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938