Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1963No. 399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendant’s first assignment of error raised the question, does a resident judge have jurisdiction to pass upon a motion of nonsuit in chambers?

Since the enactment of Chapter 142, Public Laws of 1945, (now the first proviso in G.S. 7-65) the answer has been YES. Prior thereto, it was NO. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, (1st ed.) Section 630; Bynum v. Powe, 97 N.C. 374, 2 S.E. 170; McFetters v. McFetters, 219 N.C. 731, 14 S.E. 2d 833.

Chapter 92, Public Laws of 1921, Extra Session (now G.S. 1-209) gave the clerks of the Superior Court authority to enter judgments of nonsuit and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Fullwood v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Knopf v. KnopfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API