Scott v. Scott
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendant’s first assignment of error raised the question, does a resident judge have jurisdiction to pass upon a motion of nonsuit in chambers?
Since the enactment of Chapter 142, Public Laws of 1945, (now the first proviso in G.S. 7-65) the answer has been YES. Prior thereto, it was NO. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, (1st ed.) Section 630; Bynum v. Powe, 97 N.C. 374, 2 S.E. 170; McFetters v. McFetters, 219 N.C. 731, 14 S.E. 2d 833.
Chapter 92, Public Laws of 1921, Extra Session (now G.S. 1-209) gave the clerks of the Superior Court authority to enter judgments of nonsuit and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Fullwood v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Knopf v. KnopfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.