Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Waitz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 18, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

Bar counsel appeals from the judgment of the single .justice allowing Paul Waitz’s fifth petition for rein*299statement to the practice of law from an indefinite suspension entered on October 2, 1987, retroactive to September 8, 1983. The Board of Bar Overseers (board) recommended that the fifth petition for reinstatement be denied. The single justice allowed the petition and denied bar counsel’s motion for a stay of execution.1 We reverse and order the reinstatement of Waitz’s indefinite suspension from the office of attorney at law.2

1. The facts. The facts are as follows. Paul Waitz was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. BergeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re DawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. In re EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. In the Matter of WeissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. In re Allan Yon Kwong WongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. In re FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API