Legal Opinion

Perry v. Grant

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1991No. 1:CV-91-1193PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs John F. Perry, M.D. and U.S. Taxpayers Party of Pennsylvania (“U.S. Taxpayers”) 1 challenge the constitutionali ty of ballot access requirements imposed on independent party candidates in Senatorial elections by sections 2776 and 2911 2 of the Pennsylvania Election Code. 3 Perry attempted to qualify for a position on the ballot as a candidate of the U.S. Taxpayers party in the November 5, 1991 special election to fill the unexpired term of former United States Senator John Heinz who died tragically in a mid-air collision on April 4, 1991.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Valenti v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Rogers v. CorbettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Valenti v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Patriot Party of Pennsylvania v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Rogers v. CorbettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API