Legal Opinion

Perley v. McGray

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 18, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action of assumpsit upon an account annexed. Defendant pleaded general issue, and at the conclusion of testimony case was reported to Law Court upon certain agreed stipulations. Case stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This is an action of assumpsit upon an account annexed to recover the sum of three hundred twenty-six dollars and fifty-two cents. The account annexed is,

Bangor, Maine, July 26, 1915.

Edwin McGray

To Alvin H. Perley, Dr.

1910.

July 1. Balance due according to bills rendered on account of Groceries and other supplies furnished the said Edwin McGray by the said Perley from the stock of goods belonging to the said Perley in a store conducted by the said Perley in Charleston, Me........................... $251 17

Int. to date of writ.......................... 75 35

Total…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anchor Milling Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Kingsley v. DelanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Turner's v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penning, Dornbusch & Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API