Legal Opinion

Penning, Dornbusch & Co. v. Greenfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The suit was for the balance claimed by plaintiff corporation to be due it as the result of a series of stock transactions between the parties. Plaintiff is a dealer in corporate stock — defendant-appellant was a customer. No stock was ever delivered into the physical possession of defendant, no payment on account was made, except in one instance presently to be noted; and there was no writing signed by the defendant, although the amount involved was in each of the three cases over $500. Comp. Stat., p. 4648, § 4. This provision of the Sales…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James C. Goff Co. v. LunnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
  2. Perley v. McGraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. Laird & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Mullica v. ClapsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API