Legal Opinion
Teachers v. Chino Valley Unified Sch. Dist.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 29, 2018No. E068163PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcKINSTER, Acting P. J.
*735*534On December 21, 2016, plaintiff and appellant Associated Chino Teachers (ACT) filed a verified petition for writ of mandate, seeking to prevent defendant and respondent Chino Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) from releasing two documents relating to the results of an investigation into a public high school teacher's (Doe) actions as a girls' volleyball coach. Doe's actions did not result in any type of discipline or adverse action from the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC). The trial court denied the petition. ACT appeals contending the disclosure of these…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Department of State v. Washington Post Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citizens Oversight, Inc. v. Vu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Citizens Oversight v. VuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Community Action Agency of Butte County v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Doe v. San Jose Unified School District BoardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.