Legal Opinion

Jones v. C & D Technologies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 25, 2014No. 1:11-cv-01431-JMS-DKLPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER 1

JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court are: (1) Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 260]; and (2) Defendant C & D Technologies, Inc.’s (“C & D”) Second Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 262]. The Court held a hearing on the cross motions on March 12, 2014.

*1057I.

Standard of Review

A motion for summary judgment asks the Court to find that a trial is unnecessary because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, instead, the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Andres A.B. v. Warden of the California City Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. Black v. Driveline Retail Merchandising IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
  4. Comonfort Pastrana v. Medji Restaurant LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  5. Daniel v. Pacific NW LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API