Legal Opinion

Rock v. Hiatt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 903SC551PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

We note at the outset that petitioner voluntarily abandoned assignment of error three concerning the trial court’s signing of the judgment on 22 February 1990 and filing the same on 28 February 1990 prior to considering petitioner’s objections to the proposed judgment. We shall now address the remaining assignments of error.

I

Petitioner’s assignments of error focus upon two elements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-16.2. Petitioner first argues that the trial court erred in determining that petitioner had “willfully refused” to submit to a chemical analysis on the grounds that he did not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  3. Steinkrause v. TatumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Moore v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Hartman v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API