Legal Opinion

Barr v. Stroh Brewery

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1991No. Docket 126155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission refusing to allow defendants to coordinate a lump sum distribution to plaintiff. We reverse and remand.

This case was submitted to the magistrate on a stipulation of facts. Plaintiff was employed by Stroh Brewery as a driver/salesman. In November, 1982, he was injured on the job. Defendants began paying plaintiff wage loss benefits of $266.48 a week in February, 1983. In 1984, Stroh’s divested itself of plaintiff’s employing unit and terminated its pension plan for those employees.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Corbett v. Montgomery Ward & Co, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Fraley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. McCallum v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API