Legal Opinion

Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission) finding that Employer retaliated against Wilmer Baker (Complainant) for participating in Commission cases and for opposing unlawful practices under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (Act)1 and awarding back pay, lost overtime pay and interest thereon to Complainant for the time he was terminated from employment until he was reinstated.

Employer hired Complainant as a rough grinder in 1973 and he later became a welder. After being…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Fisler v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Balshy v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Rife v. Borough of DauphinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Del Ciotto v. Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Penn Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API