Legal Opinion
Islar v. Whole Foods Markets Group, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 17, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-1098Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY ISLAR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1098 (RDM) WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Gregory Islar was terminated from his position at a supermarket operated by Defendant Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. (“Whole Foods”). Islar now brings claims against Whole Foods for (1) violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (2) breach of implied contract; and (3) negligent retention and supervision. See Dkt. 1-1 at 8–15. Whole Foods has moved to dismiss the third count for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.