In re Keogh
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*481Memorandum. The order appealed from should be modified by eliminating therefrom such parts thereof as strike out paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 of the answer. The question certified must be answered in the negative. The Federal court judgment convicting appellant herein of this misdemeanor is prima facie proof of the crime charged (Matter of Donegan, 282 N. Y. 285, 293; also, 294 N. Y. 704, affg. 265 App. Div. 774) and of his unfitness to practice law. However, fairness and justice suggest that there be a wide range of inquiry as to facts which have a bearing on the ultimate issue of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re DoneganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re MischlichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- In re GlucksmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.