Legal Opinion

Catholic Health Initiatives v. Heath Family Chiropractic

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Catholic Health Initiatives (Employer) petitions for review of a March 19, 1998 decision and order of a Medical Fee Review Section Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer concluded that Employer was estopped from denying liability for payment of medical services provided to Brian Stipes (employee) and that Employer violated Section 306(f.l)(5) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 by failing to promptly pay or deny liability for medical bills submitted by Heath Family Chiropractic (Provider). We reverse.

On January 10, 1997, Provider filed an Application for Fee Review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson Township Volunteer Fire Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Kurtiak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Health Care Services Review DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Nickel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry Bureau of Workers' Compensation Health Care Services Review DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Royal Insurance v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API