Legal Opinion

McClure v. United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 13, 2016No. Case No. 1:14-CV-845Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES

GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Jason McClure, has filed a motion for an award of costs and attorney’s fees against Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1). State Farm has filed a response, arguing that: (1) § 1132(g)(1) does not apply in this case because State Farm is not an ERISA plan and McClure’s claims against State Farm were based not on ERISA, but on federal common law; (2) even if § 1132(g)(1) applies, based…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API