Legal Opinion

Board of Water Commissioners v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1902No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to "Wayne; Bohnert, J. Assumpsit by the board of water commissioners of the city of Detroit against the Detroit Citizens’ Street-Bail-way Company to recover compensation for water furnished for street sprinkling. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The controlling question in this case rests upon a construction of the statute providing for supplying water to the city of Detroit for the public and private uses of its inhabitants. See Act No. 90, Laws 1853, §§ 5, 7. It is whether, under the law, the board must furnish water, from the hydrants or jets established *2by it, for street sprinkling gratuitously, or is entitled to compensation from tbe city funds therefor.

We have had occasion to consider this law in connection with somewhat similar claims of the city on two occasions, — first in the case of City of Detroit v. Board of Water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Board of Water Commissioners v. Commissioners of Parks & BoulevardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twitchell v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Board of Water Commissioners v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API