Legal Opinion

Thornton v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1963No. [No. 58, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

The appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury on the first count of three separate indictments charging robbery with a deadly weapon of one Steve Balog, and the attempted robbery with a deadly weapon of Donald Peacock and James Raynor. He contends (1) that he was not sufficiently identified by his accusers, (2) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon, (3) that he did not receive a fair trial, and (4) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury.

Sometime after 2 A.M. on April 14, 1962, Thornton and seven companions attacked the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vincent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Proctor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Sippio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Agresti v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Butina v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API