Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bank of Anderson v. Breedin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1922No. 10859Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Cothran

Action upon a note executed and delivered by the defendant, C. S. Breedin, to one Charles R. Moore, dated February 17, 1920, due 30 days after date, for $1,500, and 10 per cent, attorney’s fees. Although the “case” and both arguments state that the note was payable “to Charles R. Moore” without words importing negotiability in the commercial sense, it appears to have been treated throughout as a negotiable promissory note, and it will be so considered in this discussion. On the day of its execution the payee, Charles R. Moore, negotiated a transfer of the note to the plaintiff bank, indorsing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Deering v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Knobelock v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API