State v. Himuro
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C.J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the twenty day time period„prescribed by Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 286-156 for an affidavit hearing prior to revoking an arrested person’s driver’s license for refusal to submit to a sobriety test is mandatory or directory. We conclude that the twenty day hearing provision is mandatory and affirm.
I
Appellee was arrested for Driving While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor (DUI) and transported to the police station where he refused to take a blood or breath test in violation of the “implied consent law,” HRS §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Boulton v. BoultonHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
- Hawaii Corporation v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SamonteHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Malahoff v. SaitoHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BrionesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.