Oaks v. Samples
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Delaware County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by H. S. Samples against J. W. Oaks. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
This was an. action for a balance claimed to be due upon a real estate transaction. Judgment was for defendant in error. The only question presented by the plaintiff in error is that the verdict is. not sustained by the evidence.
It appears from the record that the plaintiff in error in no way challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to-support a verdict in favor of defendant in error until after the verdict was rendered. It came too late then to save the point now presented. It has been frequently and uniformly held by this court that, if the plaintiff in error does…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Haizlip v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by21 opinions
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bank of Commerce of Sulphur v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.