Chan Healthcare Group, PS v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This consolidated appeal presents an issue of first impression in our circuit, namely the scope of appellate jurisdiction to review a district court’s remand order in a class action case founded on federal question jurisdiction. Remand orders are not appealable as a matter of course. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). Nonetheless, as part of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), Congress created an exception under 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(1) that permits courts of appeals to accept appeals from remand orders in cases that are removed “under this section.” Joining our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kristy Douglas v. Xerox Business ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Gpp, Inc. v. Guardian Protection Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- 3139 Mount Whitney Rd. Trust Dated 06/14/2021 v. TonerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Cecilia Cole v. Raju PatelDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Chen v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.