Legal Opinion · Dissent

Verkouteren v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 6, 1969No. Nos. 20889-20894Published

1DissentLeventhal, Circuit Judge

We are again confronted with the task of applying the skeletal provisions constituting the District of Columbia income tax law to determine the liability of a shareholder whose close corporation has liquidated and has distributed to its stockholders all of the corporate assets.

This problem has been the focus, one way or another, of more cases, decided cases and pending cases, both at the administrative stage and in litigation, than any other issue under the D.C. tax law. The problem is generated by the sketchiness of the D.C. tax provisions, the need for applying them to business transactions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Verkouteren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Berliner v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API