Legal Opinion
Vukmirovic v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2010No. 05-75936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SCHROEDER; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
When this petitioner’s case was before us over six years ago we remanded, holding that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and Immigration Judge (“IJ”) had erred as a matter of law in ruling that the petitioner was not eligible for asylum consideration. See Vukmirovic v. Ashcroft, 362 *1045F.3d 1247, 1253 (9th Cir.2004) (“Vukmirovic I ”). Unfortunately after remand Petitioner’s newly retained counsel was not immediately able to contact the Petitioner to file a notice of appearance; the immigration court gave…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ranjit Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Vikesh Datt SHARMA; Vijanti Devi Sharma, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Youssef Adib Farhoud v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Fong Yang Lo, AKA Fong Yang Yu Bin Lo v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Predrag Vukmirovic v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vukmirovic v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Montejo-Gonzalez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Vukmirovic v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Vukmirovic v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011