Legal Opinion

Kassabian v. Jones

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1957No. 3982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*275OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

In an earlier suit Kassabian’s predecessor sought termination of a lease and option to Jones on the ground that the latter had assigned the same to Bur-Wy, contrary to the provisions of the lease. Those provisions had granted to J ones, as lessee, “the exclusive right, privilege and option” etc. which plaintiff construed to mean that the lease and option were personal to Jones and equivalent to a covenant against assignment. A motion to dismiss was granted. Thereafter Kassabian filed the present action in which he sought reformation of the instrument to include…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Keidatz v. AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zalk-Josephs Co. v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tomiyasu v. GoldenNevada Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API