Legal Opinion

Frohm v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 14, 2025No. 4:22-cv-06002Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARLENE FROHM, Case No. 22-cv-06002-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN JUDGMENT FRANCISCO, 11 Re: ECF No. 87 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment brought by Defendant City and 14 County of San Francisco (“the City”). ECF No. 87. The Court will grant the motion in part and 15 deny it in part. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff Darlene Frohm, a Black woman, worked for the City’s Office of Contract 18…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API