Legal Opinion

Gbur v. Golio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DANIELS, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal, in a medical malpractice case, from an Order entered by the trial court on June 22, 2006, denying Appellant’s (Defendant below) Motion for Posi>-Trial Relief, affirming the jury’s verdict in favor of Plaintiffs, and awarding Delay Damages to Plaintiffs pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 238.

¶2 Appellant raises five issues on appeal:

1. Did the trial court err in finding the Appellee’s expert witness, a radiation oncologist, was qualified to testify as to the standard of care for a urologist, such as Appellant herein?

2. Did the trial court err in allowing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Kemp v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Whitaker v. Frankford HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Crespo, A. v. Hughes, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Gbur v. GolioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API