Legal Opinion

Fucich Contracting, Inc. v. Shread-Kuyrkendall and Associates, Incorporated

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 3, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02885Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA FUCICH CONTRACTING, INC. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 18-2885 SHREAD-KUYRKENDALL AND SECTION M (4) ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a motion for entry of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) filed by Timken Gears and Services, Inc. d/b/a Philadelphia Gear (“Philadelphia Gear”).1 Shread-Kuyrkendall & Associates, Inc. and XL Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, “SKA”) oppose the motion,2 and Philadelphia Gear replies in support of its motion.3 Having considered the parties’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. PYCA Industries, Inc. v. Harrison County Waste Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Brandt v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Eldredge v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API