Legal Opinion
Modern Pool Products, Inc. v. Rudel Machinery Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 26, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Birns, J.
In January, 1965, Modern Pool Products, Inc., the plaintiff, located in Greenwich, Connecticut, delivered a pipe-bending machine to an Illinois factory, as recommended by defendant, Rudel Machinery Company, Inc., of New York City, for certain repairs to be undertaken by defendant. The repairs were not made. Nevertheless the machine remained at the factory for more than a year. Plaintiff now seeks damages for reduced market value of the machine resulting from an alleged breach of contract by defendant..
Plaintiff’s claim rests in large measure upon correspondence with the defendant. In this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mactier's Administrators v. FrithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- L. & E. Wertheimer, Inc. v. Wehle-Hartford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Oliver v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Morey v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Staples v. Pan-American Wall Paper & Paint Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 1014 Fifth Avenue Realty Corp. v. Manhattan Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sterngass v. MaiselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Calvert v. GilbertHopewell County Circuit Court · 2012
- Hagshama Manhattan 10 Gold, LLC v. StrulovitzZDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021