Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Wells

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

David A. Wells, the testator, is survived by his widow, but no direct descendants. This action is brought by his sister for the construction of the will which, after a specific legacy of $100,000 to the widow and bequests of family pictures and effects to the sister, bequeaths the remainder in trust. The income is to •be paid to the widow during her life, and after her death the income of $10,000 is to be paid to a cemetery association and one-fifteenth of the income from the remainder to be paid to each of the following: John E. Wells, a nephew of decedent; Gertrude S. Ackerknecht and Mary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of TrevorNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. In Re the Will of HornerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. In Re the Accounting of SilsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Matter of GallienNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StulmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re ChalmersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Richards v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. State v. Atlantic Audio-Visual Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. In re the Estate of AndrusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API