Legal Opinion
Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Angelloz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1936No. 1519PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTT, Judge.
The suit is to recover the sum of $1,858.-61, less a credit of $32.50, and is based on the following document signed by the three defendants, Howard Angelloz, D. D. An-gelloz, and A. J. Angelloz, viz.:
“Grosse Tete, La.
“September 8th, 1931.
“The Consolidated Companies, Inc,,.
Plaquemine, Louisiana.
“Dear Sirs: — In Re: — Account of A. A. Angelloz with yourselves.
“We hereby agree and bind ourselves to pay you six months after date any balance due you, if any, on the present account of A. A. Angelloz with the understanding that there will be no interest charge on same.”
“Yours truly,
“[Sign…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of CancienneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Peoples' Bank v. LemarieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- John T. Hardie's Sons & Co. v. ScheenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Slidell v. PritchardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russell v. DougetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Federal Farm Mortg. Corp. v. HattenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Consolidated Companies v. AngellozLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936