Legal Opinion
Cashman Equipment Corp. v. Rozel Operating Co.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-363PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MARY ANN VIAL LEMMON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss all claims asserted against it by Stokes & Spiehler Offshore, Inc. (Doc. # 162) is GRANTED as to Stokes’ claim under the Texas Prompt Payment Statute, Texas Insurance Code § 542.060, and that claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to Stokes’ claims for defense and indemnity and bad faith penalties under Louisiana Revised Statutes §§ 22:1892 and 22:1973.
BACKGROUND
Rozel Operating Co. operates a natural gas production platform located in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser v. Burlington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Haynes v. Chubb & Son IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Rogers v. Integrated Exploration & Prod., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- Rogers v. Integrated Exploration & Prod., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019