Legal Opinion

State v. Milosevich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1994No. 10-92-09745A; CA A80779 (Control); 10-92-09745B; CA A80780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*53EDMONDS, J.

In these two cases, consolidated for appeal, the state appeals from an order suppressing evidence found at the defendants’ residence. ORS 138.060. The court held that the affidavit supporting the search warrant was legally insufficient. We reverse.

A search warrant was issued for the Eugene residence of both defendants based on the affidavit of a Lane County Deputy Sheriff. The affidavit described the discovery by Forest Service officers of a marijuana “plantation,” containing 19 plants.1 An alarm and camera system were installed to monitor traffic to and from the site. On August…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. SevenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tseu Ex Rel. Hobbs v. JeyteHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. MaxfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. MilosevichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API