Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2016No. B275603Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAKER, J.—

While a husband and wife were litigating their ongoing marriage dissolution case, a limited liability company run by the wife filed a civil action concerning a disputed debt at issue in the dissolution proceedings. The superior court deemed the two cases related and assigned the civil case to the already assigned judge. The question we decide is whether the limited liability company’s Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 (section 170.6) challenge 1 in the related civil action requires transfer of both cases to a new judge.

I

Peymaneh Rothstein (Peymaneh) and Mark Rothstein…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Frisk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API