Legal Opinion
WildEarth Guardians v. National Park Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2010No. 08-1479PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from WildEarth Guardians’ lawsuit challenging the National Park Service’s proposal to reduce the elk population in Rocky Mountain National Park. Safari Club International and Safari Club International Foundation (referred to together as Safari Club) are two organizations representing hunting and conservation interests which participated in the administrative proceedings that led to the promulgation of the National Park Service’s elk population management plan. Safari Club sought to intervene as of right in WildEarth’s lawsuit as a party defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Western Energy Alliance v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Kane County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Wildearth Guardians v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Statewide Masonry v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.