Legal Opinion
Wildearth Guardians v. Jewell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1724PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Granting the State of Wyoming’s Motion to Intervene; Granting the State of Colorado’s Motion to Intervene; Granting the State of Utah’s Motion to Intervene
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility initiated this action to challenge the approval of oil and gas leases on public lands in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah. Am. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 22. Plaintiffs sued the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, the Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- WildEarth Guardians v. National Park ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- James Roane v. Michele LeonhartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson Living Trust v. Energen Resources CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. FerrieroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Friends of the Earth v. HaalandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Internet Sports International, LTD. v. Amelco USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Lighthiser v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.