Legal Opinion · Dissent

Worker's Compensation Claim of Blommel v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of Employment, Division of Workers' Safety & Compensation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2005No. 04-240Published

1DissentBurke, Justice

[124] I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the decision of the hearing examiner that Ms. Blommel failed to file a timely claim of injury. The majority, by employing a de novo standard of review, fails to accord proper deference to the decision of the hearing examiner.

[125] We articulated the proper standard of review in Beitel v. Workers' Compensation Division, 991 P.2d 1242, 1245 (Wyo.1999): 1

Under § 27-14-502(a), an employee's duty to report a work-related injury commences when the general nature of his injury becomes apparent. We have stated that an injury is apparent when the employee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brees v. Gulley Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Curnow v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zielinske v. Johnson County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Logue v. STATE WORKER'S SAFETY & COMP. DIV.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API