Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Rhinesmith & Simonson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wexford. (Aldrich, J.) Attachment suit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was commenced in justice’s court by writ of attachment, which was issued on December 3, 1887, returnable December 12 thereafter. The writ was placed in the hands of an officer, who made return as follows:

“ By virtue of the within writ of attachment, I, Frank Willey, constable, on the 3d day of December, 1887, seized the goods and chattels of the defendants within named, which are mentioned in an inventory, of which the annexed is a copy; and I hereby certify that I have ■made diligent search and inquiry, and am unable to find the said Bhinesmith & Simonson in said county, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Withington v. SouthworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Chaddock v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Glenn v. GunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Millard v. HaywardMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sweet v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API