Legal Opinion

James Bump v. Tak Chang And Suet Mui Chang

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 29, 2013No. 69026-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON o JAMES BUMP, No. 69026-4-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE r= o--; v. 33" UNPUBLISHED OPINION . --. t r- TAK CHANG and SUET MUI CHANG, cr. Respondents. FILED: July 29, 2013 Schindler, J. — Because James Bump failed to respond to discovery requests or comply with the case scheduling order, the trial court dismissed his lawsuit against Tak Chang and Suet Mui Chang. On appeal, Bump contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for reconsideration and reinstated the action. Because the record shows that Bump's violation of the discovery…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Story v. Shelter Bay CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API