Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Rhode Island
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2001No. 00-2429PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frequent litigator John Shewchun and Charlene Hayden appeal a district court judgment that dismissed their suit for want of personal jurisdiction. The ease has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. *302We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Shewchun and Hayden filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Rhode Island and that state’s attorney general. Shewchun claimed that the defendants had, since the early 1980s, systematically violated his civil rights by maintaining…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Peter Filipas Emma Filipas v. Addie Lee Lemons, (Deceased) John Doe, (Heirs) Buckeye Union Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- James Malcolm Tuggle, Jr. v. William Seabold, Warden, and David L. Armstrong, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance v. Grand Pointe, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Beaver v. Siemens Healthineers, AGDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Flummerfelt v. City of TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- ILNYTSKYY v. Equipnet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Pearson Education, Inc. v. C & N Logistics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.