Legal Opinion
Deckers Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 2, 2008No. 2008-1011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
This customs case concerns the proper classification of three styles of Teva® Sport Sandals: “Pretty Rugged Sports Sandal,” “Terradactyl Sports Sandal,” and the “Aquadactyl Sports Sandals” (collectively, “Teva® Sandals”). Deckers Corporation (“Deckers”) appeals the final judgment and decision by the United States Court of International Trade, after a trial on the merits, holding that the merchandise at issue was properly classified under subheading 6404.19.35 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Deckers Corp., Inc. v. United States,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Arko Foods International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Sigma-Tau Healthscience, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Storewall, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.