Legal Opinion

Lowenstein v. Hargraves Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant, Hargraves Mills, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the-plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew. York on the ,13th day of Hoy ember, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 1st day of December,. 1909, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:. The defendant is a corporation and it manufactured aud sold unbleached cotton go'ods. The plaintiffs are copartners and they *233were engaged in buying unbleached cotton goods and in bleaching, which is known as converting, and selling the same. The defendant was aware of the fact that the .plaintiffs purchased goods with a view to reselling them. This action is brought for a breach of a contract negotiated for the parties by brokers on the 30th day of October, 1906, by which the defendant sold and agreed to deliver to the plaintiffs 100,000 yards of goods at the price of seven and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Delafield v. J. K. Armsby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Delafield v. . the J.K. Armsby CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. McManus v. American Woolen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finkelstein v. SelwitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API